Reflection Summary
Featuring Ustadha Hina Khan-Mukhtar & Ustadha Hosai Mojaddidi
CelebrateMercy · Raising Beautiful Hearts Prophetic Parenting series · Episode 3
Ustadha Hosai describes the Prophetic model as maintaining parental authority while treating children with respect.
Ustadha Hosai encourages children to communicate their wants through reasoned conversation rather than relying only on emotion, arguing, or pressure.
Ustadha Hina connects learning to accept appropriate parental authority with learning to submit to Allah and the teachings of the Prophet ï·º.
“This shoe or that shoe” works; “shoes or no shoes” does not. Some things stay non-negotiable.
Ustadha Hina encourages creativity around limits so that children don’t experience their faith only as restriction, while still understanding that real boundaries remain.
Talk about phones and gaming long before the teen years, based on maturity and responsibility, not age.
Children today have far more autonomy than past generations, yet we still want them to ask before they act and to be grateful for what they receive. Where is the line? The host opens with a thought from Brené Brown: without boundaries, children can easily become entitled. So how do we set boundaries in a way that truly shapes character?
Ustadha Hosai points to the teaching attributed to Sayyiduna Ali about the stages of child development and what is appropriate at each stage. Today, she says, many parents want to befriend their children very early and slide into permissive parenting, almost seeing their own authority as a threat. The confusion comes from mixing up authoritarian parenting (harsh, controlling) with authoritative parenting (firm, warm, and respectful). The Prophetic model is the second: a parent holds their ground and exercises authority, but always with respect, just as the Prophet ď·ş respected every child he met.
As a teacher of logic and critical thinking, she reminds children that they are intellectual beings. Islamic tradition describes three faculties in a person: the rational, the emotional, and the appetitive. When we default to appetites and emotions, we lose negotiating power and end up in arguments and power struggles. When we lead with the intellect, we can actually make our case. She once counseled a family whose daughters kept fighting their parents over what they wanted. She suggested the girls make a PowerPoint presentation laying out why they wanted something, with evidence and reasons. The parents were so impressed by the effort and the lack of emotional manipulation that they responded favorably. Teaching children to communicate well, she says, prevents a great deal of conflict, and it should start early.
Ustadha Hina adds a spiritual dimension: we are our children’s first relationship with authority. To learn to submit to Allah and follow the Prophet ﷺ, sometimes without needing every “why” answered, children first learn to accept guidance from their parents. Today “choice” often means “control,” so parents should ask: are we building a healthy sense of autonomy, or a false sense of control? She tells of a friend who gave her four-year-old choices about everything, until one day she said, “Put on your shoes, we’re going to Trader Joe’s,” and he replied, “Okay, but what’s my other choice?”
The solution is to offer choices you’re genuinely happy with: this pair of shoes or that one, while wearing shoes stays non-negotiable. Another friend let her toddler choose his car seat, but not to put his feet up toward a Quran in the seat pocket; if he insisted, he’d sit in the other seat. The boundary stays clear, and the child’s choice lands within it. If boundaries are too tight, life feels like a prison and children rebel; if there are none, boundaries become invisible, and so does Allah. Ustadha Hosai notes the “paradox of choice”: too many options can overwhelm children, so the parent’s job is to set the options. Ustadha Hina distinguishes pampering from spoiling: a pampered child who doesn’t get what they want responds with gratitude and contentment; a spoiled child feels entitled and that life, and even God, is unfair.
How do we say no well? Ustadha Hina shares a friend’s alternative to “Because I said so”: when his children ask why, he answers, “Because I love you.” She also describes hearing no as a kind of “no vitamin”—something she believes is healthy for children. Ustadha Hosai responds that this is a beautiful example of maintaining gentleness even when a parent has to be firm; the Prophet ﷺ was known for rarely turning anyone away, and silence can sometimes be gentler than a blunt no. Ustadha Hina’s well-known tip is for every no, give two yeses. It is not about fearing your child’s disappointment; it is about being creative in the early years so children don’t experience their faith as something that only holds them back. The limits remain, and the wisdom behind them should be explained. Many of her now-adult children have told her how grateful they are for those limits, having seen the chaos when people have nothing holding them back.
On phones and gaming, Ustadha Hosai advises setting expectations early, well before adolescence. She told her boys when they were young that they would not simply get a smartphone at a certain age because everyone else had one; the decision would depend on maturity and responsibility, and any phone would come with limits. When the time came, they were happy with a basic phone for calls and texts. She also shared evidence with them, including a documentary on how heavy screen use affects the developing brain, so they understood the reasons. When a relative gifted her sons a PlayStation, she accepted it graciously but struck a deal: they could play once they cleaned out the garage. It took them two years, which showed how little they really valued it. To this day, the console is available but rarely touched.
Many parents want to be their child’s friend early on and become permissive, as if parental authority were a threat. Ustadha Hosai distinguishes authoritarian parenting from authoritative parenting, describing the latter—maintaining authority while showing respect—as closer to the Prophetic model. The Prophet ﷺ showed respect to every child he met while still guiding them. Parents can hold their ground and exercise authority without harshness. As Brené Brown notes, children without boundaries can become entitled. Boundaries are part of love.
Think of one area where you have become permissive to avoid conflict, and decide on one calm, respectful boundary to restore there.
Islamic tradition describes three faculties: the rational, the emotional, and the appetitive. When children default to appetite and emotion, requests become power struggles. Ustadha Hosai coached two daughters to present their case to their parents with reasons and evidence, even as a PowerPoint. The parents responded favorably because it was thoughtful, not manipulative. Teaching communication and critical thinking early prevents a great deal of conflict in the home.
Next time your child wants something, invite them to explain calmly why it matters to them, and genuinely listen.
Ustadha Hina describes parents as a child’s first experience of authority and encourages giving children meaningful choices without creating the expectation that everything is negotiable. Giving endless choices can backfire, like the four-year-old who asked, “What’s my other choice?” about going grocery shopping. Ustadha Hosai builds on this with the “paradox of choice,” noting that too many options can themselves become overwhelming. Together, their examples point toward offering children real choices within boundaries the parent has already decided are acceptable.
Turn one daily battle into a choice between two options you are genuinely fine with.
Ustadha Hina shares a friend’s practice of answering “Why?” with “Because I love you” rather than “Because I said so,” and describes hearing no as a healthy part of childhood. Ustadha Hosai adds that firmness can still be expressed gently. “For every no, give two yeses” helps children experience faith as generous rather than restrictive, while the wisdom behind limits is still explained. Pampered children respond to a no with contentment; spoiled children with entitlement. For big requests like phones and gaming, set expectations years in advance: access depends on maturity and responsibility, comes with limits, and the reasons are shared openly.
If phones or gaming are on the horizon, talk with your child this month about your family’s approach, before the pressure begins.
Replace a command with a choice between two options you are happy with, like “Do you want to brush your teeth before or after your story?”
Experiment with replacing an automatic “Because I said so” with a response that communicates both love and the boundary. When appropriate, help your child understand the reason behind the limit.
When you say no to something, look for two things you can happily say yes to.
For bigger requests, ask older children to explain their reasons calmly, or even write them down, and take them seriously.
Explain your family’s approach to phones and gaming long before the teen years: it depends on maturity, comes with limits, and you’ll share the reasons why.
There are no right or wrong answers here, just space to think about your own family.
Do I lean more toward permissive or authoritarian parenting? What would a firm but respectful middle look like for me?
When my child asks “why?”, how do I usually respond?
Am I offering my child healthy choices, or so many that they expect control over everything?
How does my child usually ask for what they want, and how could I help them use reason instead of pressure?
When I say no, does my child tend to respond with contentment or with a sense of unfairness?
Every family is different. If you’ve tried something that made a difference in your family, we’d love to hear about it.
More reflections that may help you think about this from another angle.